10 Quick, Important Developments On The Planned Parenthood Scandal
By Mollie Hemingway - Posted at The Federalist:
The abortion provider says its web site was attacked. But was it really?
Whether or not the story generates major media attention, the Center for Medical Progress’ expose of Planned Parenthood’s participation in the harvesting and sale of fetal organs continues to feature major updates. Here are 10 of them.
1) Injunction On Release Of Potential Upcoming Video
Late Wednesday, the Los Angeles Superior Court issued a temporary restraining order against the Center for Medical Progress, the pro-life group whose undercover journalism has produced three videos showing Planned Parenthood officials engaged in the practice of harvesting of organs from unborn children killed by abortions. Under the terms of the order, the non-profit organization is banned from releasing video of a May lunch attended by three StemExpress officials. The complaint alleges multiple infractions by the Center for Medical Progress, including invasion of privacy, breach of contract, and unfair competition.
The New York Times Supreme Court reporter suggested the injunction was not constitutional.
Read more here...
The abortion provider says its web site was attacked. But was it really?
 |
| Cecile Richards/ Planned Parenthood |
1) Injunction On Release Of Potential Upcoming Video
Late Wednesday, the Los Angeles Superior Court issued a temporary restraining order against the Center for Medical Progress, the pro-life group whose undercover journalism has produced three videos showing Planned Parenthood officials engaged in the practice of harvesting of organs from unborn children killed by abortions. Under the terms of the order, the non-profit organization is banned from releasing video of a May lunch attended by three StemExpress officials. The complaint alleges multiple infractions by the Center for Medical Progress, including invasion of privacy, breach of contract, and unfair competition.
The New York Times Supreme Court reporter suggested the injunction was not constitutional.
Read more here...
Comments
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment, but profanity, anti-Christian or argumentative comments will not be published. Thank you, ed.