I helped start the Moral Majority. Trump is the opposite of what we wanted.



By Michael Farris - Posted at The Washington Post:

“Lesser of two evils” isn’t how principled Christians should vote.

Over the years, I’ve worked closely with many of the hundreds of faith leaders who trekked to Trump Tower on Tuesday to meet with presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump. I’ve opposedTrump, and wasn’t invited. But even if I had been, I wouldn’t have gone. I believe these pilgrims meant well, but I think their judgment about associating with Trump is troubling and unwise. In embracing this brazen man — whether tacitly or overtly — they appear to have forgotten the very premises on which the Moral Majority and the social conservative movement was founded.

His candidacy is the antithesis of everything we set out to achieve.

The first national meeting of the Moral Majority took place on a snowy day in February 1980. I was a young lawyer from Spokane, and attended as the newly minted Washington state director of Jerry Falwell’s organization. We were moved by our beliefs. And if those of us who were gathered had been told, back then, that 36 years later our movement would embrace a candidate like Trump for president, our unanimous response would have been: “It will be a cold day in hell before that happens.”

Comments

Featured Posts:

Is a Plurality of Elders for Southern Baptists?

Roy Moore's alleged pursuit of a young girl is the symptom of a larger problem in evangelical circles

Why We Need a New Reformation

Sutherland Springs: Worship resumes with call to overcome

Darkness & light at Sutherland Springs