What National Interest Does Bombing Syria Serve?




Serious observers of world affairs are having a very difficult time explaining what strategic effects the missile attack on a Syrian military airport had.

The United States bombs a country’s airfield, and the president whom Washington’s foreign policy community once universally considered to be a lemon is now credited with being a resolute commander-in-chief who faced down an atrocity with flying colors. A headline in the Huffington Post couldn’t have summarized this dynamic better: “Cable News Praises Trump on Syria, Because Bombing Stuff is ‘Presidential.’”

Blowing up a couple dozen planes from a war criminal’s arsenal makes us all feel good for a few days, especially if it’s in retaliation for a horrible war crime against innocent men, women, and children. Outside of a shot across the dictator’s bow, however, serious observers of world affairs are having a very difficult time explaining what strategic effects the missile attack on a Syrian military airport had.
Read more here.

Comments

Popular Posts

Why Did Aaron Hernandez Write ‘John 3:16’ on His Forehead before Killing Himself?

Will Grigg: 'A Mighty Voice for Justice and Liberty'

Why calling Rick Warren a “General” is significant